Celebrating Womens History Month Ideas

The United States celebrates Womens History Month in March and the entire world commemorates International Womens Day on the 8th of the month. These celebrations provide perfect opportunities to honor the women in your life, learn about the remarkable female leaders throughout history, and share the importance of women in society with younger generations of boys and girls. Here are some ideas for how to celebrate.   Biographies Do you have a daughter, niece, granddaughter, or another girl in your life? Give her a biography of a woman who accomplished important goals in her life. If you can match the woman to the girls interests, all the better. (If you dont know her interests, celebrate the month by getting to know them.) Do the same for a son, nephew, grandson, or other boy or young man in your life. Boys need to read about women of accomplishment too! Dont do a hard sell, though. Most boys will read about women—fictional or real—if you dont make it a big deal. The earlier you start, of course, the better. If he just wont take to a book about a woman, then pick a biography of a man who supported womens rights. The Library More on books: donate to your local public or school library enough money to buy a book, and direct them to pick one focused on womens history. Spread the Word Casually drop into conversation, a few times this month, something about a woman you admire. If you need some ideas or more information first, use our Womens History Guide to search for ideas. Print out copies of the Proclamation of Womens History Month and post it on a public bulletin board at your school, office, or even the grocery store. Write a Letter Buy some stamps commemorating notable women, and then send a couple of those letters youve been meaning to write to old friends. Or new ones. Get Involved Look for an organization that works in the present for an issue that you think is important. Dont just be a paper member—commemorate all the women whove helped make the world better by becoming one of them. Travel Plan a trip to a site honoring womens history. Do It Again Think ahead to next years Womens History Month. Plan to offer an article to your organizations newsletter, volunteer to initiate a project, or plan ahead to give a speech at your organizations March meeting.

A Comparative Study Of Voltaire s And Moliere s Views On...

A Comparative Study of Voltaire s and Molià ¨re’s Views on Religion in Candide and Tartuffe Literary works often reveal their authors views on particular social issues. Tartuffe (1669), a play by Molià ¨re, and Candide (1759), a philosophical tale by Voltaire, both deal with the question of religion in society. Tartuffe is a satire on the attitudes of the bourgeoisie toward religion in seventeenth-century France. Molià ¨re firmly believes in religious moderation and condemns religious hypocrisy and fanaticism. Published almost a century later, Voltaire s Candide satirizes eighteenth-century European society by criticizing the hypocrisy of the clergy. As an Enlightenment thinker, Voltaire advocates the importance of free thinking and scientific reasoning. Although he believes in the existence of God, Voltaire is severely critical of revealed religion as well as of religious optimism and fanaticism. Tartuffe is a critique of religious hypocrisy as embodied in Tartuffe. Molià ƒ ¨re’s Tartuffe is an imposter, who has no morals and merely uses religion as a cover-up for his vices and crimes. He pretends to be extremely pious, but his actions go completely against the moral codes of his religion. Moliere’s Tartuffe, and Voltaire’s Candide are each exemplary literary works of the 18th century in their own rights. Tartuffe is a satirical comedy, and Candide a thought-provoking travelogue. While each adheres austerely to its genre, various similarities as well as contrasting differencesShow MoreRelatedA Comparative Study Of Voltaire s And Moliere s Views On Religion Essay1598 Words   |  7 PagesA Comparative Study of Voltaire s and Molià ¨re s Views on Religion in Candide and Tartuffe Literary works regularly uncover their creators perspectives on specific social issues. Hypocrite (1669), a play by Molià ¨re, and Candide (1759), a philosophical story by Voltaire, both manage the subject of religion in the public eye. Fraud is a parody on the states of mind of the bourgeoisie toward religion in seventeenth-century France. Molià ¨re immovably puts stock in religious balance and denounces religious A Comparative Study Of Voltaire s And Moliere s Views On... A Comparative Study of Voltaire s and Molià ¨re s Views on Religion in Candide and Tartuffe Literary works regularly uncover their creators perspectives on specific social issues. Hypocrite (1669), a play by Molià ¨re, and Candide (1759), a philosophical story by Voltaire, both manage the subject of religion in the public eye. Fraud is a parody on the states of mind of the bourgeoisie toward religion in seventeenth-century France. Molià ¨re immovably puts stock in religious balance and denounces religious fraud and devotion. Distributed just about a century later, Voltaire s Candide mocks eighteenth-century European culture by condemning the false reverence of the church. As an Enlightenment scholar, Voltaire advocates the significance of free thinking and logical thinking. Despite the fact that he puts stock in the presence of God, Voltaire is extremely disparaging of uncovered religion and in addition of religious hopefulness and enthusiasm. Hypocrite is a study of religious af fectation as epitomized in Tartuffe. Molià ¨re s Tartuffe is a fraud, who has no ethics and simply utilizes religion as a conceal for his indecencies and wrongdoings. He professes to be to a great degree devout, yet his activities go totally against the ethical codes of his religion. Moliere s Tartuffe, and Voltaire s Candide are each commendable abstract works of the eighteenth century in their own particular rights. Hypocrite is a sarcastic satire, and Candide an intriguing travelog. While eachShow MoreRelatedA Comparative Study Of Voltaire s And Moliere s Views On Religion1522 Words   |  7 PagesA Comparative Study of Voltaire s and Molià ¨re’s Views on Religion in Candide and Tartuffe Literary works often reveal their authors views on particular social issues. Tartuffe (1669), a play by Molià ¨re, and Candide (1759), a philosophical tale by Voltaire, both deal with the question of religion in society. Tartuffe is a satire on the attitudes of the bourgeoisie toward religion in seventeenth-century France. Molià ¨re firmly believes in religious moderation and condemns religious hypocrisy and

Security and Stability in Today World for Peace-myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theSecurity and Stability in Today World for Peace. Answer: Introduction Indeed, the 21st century is relatively fee and safer particularly after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Specifically, there are numerous measures that have been taken by states and international organizations such as the UN to guarantee mutual existence and security of the world (Keynes, 2004). The measures have been very instrumental in ensuring the security and necessary stability of States (Rodrguez Aquino, 2016). Some of the measures taken to ensure global security and stability Charter of the Unites Nations (1945) Article 1 of the charter of the UN clearly stipulate that peaceful coexistence must be achieved only through diplomatic means that conforms to the principles of rule of law and justice. This article has ensured that there is mutual existence among States who are under strict obligations to respect the rule of law set by the international community (Kissinger, 2017). Similarly, arcicle 33 of the Charter of the UN stresses on the significance of preventing conflicts and settling disputes peacefully and in accordance with various measures and mechanisms that include arbitration and appeasement. The 1945 UN Charter on human rights has also helped in preventing and mitigating violence and conflicts by clearly stipulating relevant processes that can be used to settle grievances. NATOs Washington Treaty (1949) This treaty was formed to protect selected countries in Europe and North America from armed attacks. Precisely, the treaty has a mutual defence clause (article 5) that can be invoked in case a member state is under external aggression. The treaty has helped member states to coexist with perceived hostile neighbours such Russia (Kissinger, 2017). Warsaw Pact Treaty (1955) This treaty was a response by the Soviet Union to the formation of NATO which they considered hostile and a viable threat to their own security. The members states inherent desire to ensure and sustain their security resulted into this treaty (Kissinger, 2017). Universal Declaration on Human Rights (1970) The adoption and proclamation of the universal declaration of Humans Rights aimed at compelling States to ensure human dignity especially when dealing with dissenting opinions (Klabbers, 2004). UN Declaration on Friendly Relations among States (1970) The resolution aimed at defining relationships between States and ensuring peaceful coexistence among them. The treaty also gave clear guidelines on how States could amicably solve their varied differences (Klabbers, 2004). CSCE Helsinki Final Act (1975) This treaty aimed cementing security and cooperation Europe. The act also stressed on the peaceful resolution of conflicts and non-intervention in internal issues among other relevant aspects. CSCE Charter of Paris (1990) This charter brought together countries such as U.S. Canada and some Eastern bloc countries whose primary motivation was ideological harmonization and political security of their respective nations (Klabbers, 2004). CSCE Copenhagen Principles (1990) This document outlined various human rights principles and the fundamental freedoms that included the right to peaceful gathering and association among others (Klabbers, 2004). States that ratified this agreement were required to strictly adhere to its various stipulations. Budapest Memorandum on Ukraine This was an agreement signed to provide security assurances to Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan and to shelve them from the increased Russian aggressions (Klabbers, 2004). UNSC Resolutions 1267, 1373, 1540, 1989 The UNSC Resolution 1267 imposed sanctions on individuals that were perceived to be supporting terrorist groups such as Al-Qaida in Afghanistan while Resolution 1373 was a counter terrorism measure that was passed after 9/11. Correspondingly, Resolution 1540 was based on non-proliferation of dangerous weapons that could lead to mass destruction while Resolution 1989 aimed at protecting the world from the increased threats posed by terrorist acts (Klabbers, 2004). References Keynes, J. M. (2004).The economic consequences of the peace. Courier Corporation. Kissinger, H. (2017).A world restored: Metternich, Castlereagh, and the problems of peace, 1812-22. Pickle Partners Publishing. Klabbers, J. (2004). Stephen C. Schlesinger, Act of Creation: The Founding of the United Nations.International Organizations Law Review,1(1), 214-216. Rodrguez Aquino, J. L. (2016). Henry Kissinger, World Order.Foro internacional,56(1), 212-217.

Legalitites of Legal Actions Situation an Example of the Topic Government and Law Essays by

Legalitites of Legal Actions Situation 1: Illinois State Trooper Glass What improper procedure was used by the officers that caused the defense lawyers to appeal this case to the U.S. Supreme Court? Need essay sample on "Legalitites of Legal Actions Situation" topic? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you Proceed State Trooper Glass overlooked one important circumstance. According to Crimes Act of 1914, a constable must not take identification material (other than hand prints, finger prints, foot prints or toe prints) from a suspect who is at least 10 but under 18, or is incapable of managing his affairs; and has not been arrested or charged. ("Crimes Act 1914 - Sect 3zj") We can clearly see that they didnt follow this procedure. Prior to the arrest of the defendant, Trooper Glass was able to get a photograph of the person who sold him the heroine, even though there are no arrests yet. The defense appeal to the Supreme Court is legitimate action because the acquisition of the photograph or the identification material is illegal. The evidence of the in-court identification is allowed, making State Trooper Glass a witness of this case. Also, it could be used against the defendant because Glass identified him as the one who sold the prohibited drug to him. Also, the defendants conviction for selling heroin will be affirmed because of the presence of a witness, wherein it could be used as evidence against him, if Glass could possible pin point him as the one who sold him the heroin. Situation 2: Police officer vs. Jimez Did the consent to search authorize opening the brown bag? When it involves letters and sealed package, a warrant less search and seizure of such items are illegal and unreasonable. Under the Constitution of the United States, the Fourth Amendment provides protection of letters and other sealed packages because they are in the general class of effects in which the public at large has a legitimate expectation of privacy; warrant less searches of such items are presumptively unreasonable; there is so even when the letters and sealed packages are sent by a private carrier. ("Richard Allen Duck V. State of Arkansas") Clearly, the police officer made a mistake and overlooked the circumstances at hand. Even though you are permitted to search the whole car, it still restricts you from opening sealed packages. This is clear violations of other peoples rights to privacy have been stepped over and ignored (Boone). The evidence could be permitted to be used against the defendant because it is another legal case, the possession of illegal drugs. It could be used against the defendant because it is inside the defendants property which is the car, and possession of prohibited drugs is another issue. Situation 3: Lorenzs Tax Problems Should the U.S. Supreme Court hold that the evidence of the tape recorder was properly used in the federal trial of Lorenz? The evidence held in the tape recorder was not properly used for the federal trial of Lorenz. According to the federal rule of evidence 901 in a part regarding the voluntary elicitation of the recorded conversation; as long as one participant in the conversation is aware that he is being recorded, the tape fulfills this requirement. This means that a defendants Fourth Amendment rights are not violated when the conversation is electronically monitored by a government agent with consent of the government informant in the investigation. (Cain) In Lorenzs case, he was recorded without due information and it was shown when he was already in court. Because of this, Lorenz was wrongfully tried, where the evidence of the recorded conversation was used against him. The Supreme Court should affirm Lorenzs conviction of bribery because it is strengthened by the presence of the recorded conversation between them and the tax agent. It was also strengthened when he lied under the oath to tell nothing but the truth, he lied about the bribery, and that is where the recorded conversation comes in ("K9 Sniffs of Vehicles"). Situation 4: Passive Alcohol Sensor Does use of this device, which could be called a sense-enhancing device because it enables an officer to sense something otherwise possible without the device, constitute a search under United States vs. Kyllo? Using the Passive Alcohol Sensor (PAS) in order to know whether the driver is driving while intoxicated is a search just like the situation of Kyllo, wherein his house was put under surveillance, and a thermal imaging device was used to prove that inside his house, he was growing marijuana ("Kyllo V. United States"). In these cases, the government used a machine or a device which is not common in our usual materials, in order to search for evidences. It is unconstitutional to search his house using thermal imaging device without a warrant, because his was a private home, so the intrusion would be subjected to as invasion of privacy. Using PAS is different compared to Kyllos case because you are involved with a possible abuser of alcoholic substances, wherein it alters the frame of mind of people. Using PAS is acceptable especially in order to find out whos intoxicated or not without asking or smelling them References: Boone, Kevin. "Police Search: Know Your Rights". 2006. Cain, Steve. "Sound Recordings as Evidence in Court Proceedings". 2006. http://expertpages.com/news/sound_recordings_evidence.htm>. "Crimes Act 1914 - Sect 3zj". 2001. . "K9 Sniffs of Vehicles". 2005. . "Kyllo V. United States". 2005. . "Richard Allen Duck V. State of Arkansas". 2001. .